<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>On the Radar Screen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog</link>
	<description>The GeoSAR Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Precision and Accuracy</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/08/26/precision-and-accuracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/08/26/precision-and-accuracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Precision and Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geospatial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiDAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a key player in the map-making business, Fugro is always engaged in discussions about precision, accuracy, and reliability standards within the geospatial marketplace. Fugro’s GeoSAR system has unique features that ensure quality standards are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">As a key player in the map-making business, Fugro is always engaged in discussions about precision, accuracy, and reliability standards within the geospatial marketplace. Fugro’s GeoSAR system has unique features that ensure quality standards are always met. These features include 4-look acquisition data redundancy as a primary feature of the GeoSAR dual-sided radar configuration, its large side overlap on adjacent flight lines, and its profiling LiDAR. As discussed in our previous <a href="http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/category/ground-control/">“Ground Control”</a> blog post on ground control on the fly.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> Let’s first discuss what these quality terms mean in relation to GeoSAR.  Accuracy is an absolute term, describing how close the estimated elevation (or position) at a given point is to the true elevation (or position) of that point. Precision is a relative term, describing the quality of the height difference between two points.  Reliability is the ability to detect and correct measurement errors, which depends highly on the redundancy of the measurements.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> For example, imagine using an old tape measure with 1/8” markings to measure the height of a table at all four corners.  Suppose that the measurements are 30-2/8”, 30-1/8”, 29-7/8”, and 30-1/8” – or equivalent to an average of 30-1/8” with a precision of 1/8”. Suddenly, you discover you are off by an inch. That is accuracy.  The measurements were inaccurate by about 1”.  This example shows that measurements can be very precise, but not necessarily accurate, or they can be accurate, but not precise.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> To prevent such errors, the GeoSAR system uses a calibration campaign to resolve systematic errors using precisely surveyed corner reflectors at known locations on a calibration site.  A corner reflector is to radar what a benchmark is to photogrammetry—it provides a very precise geospatial correspondence between a radar point and a {X, Y, Z} location on the ground. This is done to ensure the GeoSAR measurements are accurate.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> The precision of GeoSAR, or airborne IFSAR, depends on factors such as the aircraft altitude, amount of turbulence, the separation between flight lines, terrain slope, moisture, and other factors.  In typical situations, airborne IFSAR is able to measure terrain elevation and geoposition at meter level precision.  The accuracy of GeoSAR products depend on a variety of key factors, including the GPS position of the aircraft, the quality of ground control, and the accuracy of the geoid.  Similar to GPS, Fugro GeoSAR elevations are measured in ellipsoidal heights and converted to orthometric heights using a geoid model.  The more accurate the geoid model, the more accurate the GeoSAR orthometric height will be.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> Understanding and applying these key factors is what separates Fugro’s GeoSAR services and products from other service providers. Stay tuned next week when we discuss Resolution and Posting. If you would like to continue this discussion or would like more information, please leave a comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/08/26/precision-and-accuracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the USA to Malaysia: GeoSAR’s Global Presence Continues to Grow</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/08/04/from-the-usa-to-malaysia-geosar%e2%80%99s-global-presence-continues-to-grow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/08/04/from-the-usa-to-malaysia-geosar%e2%80%99s-global-presence-continues-to-grow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaglyphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-band IFSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESRI User Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Map Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GeoSAR is back on the tradeshow trail! The past few weeks GeoSAR had a strong presence at the ESRI International User Conference in San Diego, California and Map Asia 2010 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">GeoSAR is back on the tradeshow trail! The past few weeks GeoSAR had a strong presence at the ESRI International User Conference in San Diego, California and Map Asia 2010 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. At the ESRI International User Conference, Fugro EarthData’s Megan Blaskovich participated in the poster contest presenting a striking “GeoSAR in 3D” poster highlighting GeoSAR data collected over mountainous terrain in South America converted into stereo-colorized anaglyphs. The 3D anaglyphs were generated using ESRI’s PurVIEW extension for ArcGIS along with a GeoSAR digital elevation model (DEM) and orthorectified radar imagery. To say the least, the GeoSAR poster was quite the attention grabber.</p>
<p class="bodytext">Travelling half way around the world, we joined forces with colleagues from Fugro’s South East Asia offices in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia for Map Asia 2010. Our presence was strongly felt and we were awarded Best Exhibitor at Map Asia 2010.  During the conference’s technical sessions, Fugro EarthData’s Roy Hill delivered two compelling presentations on GeoSAR solutions, one on land-use and land-cover mapping, and the other on base mapping using PurVIEW in support of NSDI initiatives. The presentations highlighted GeoSAR’s advantages in equatorial regions where persistent cloud cover, triple canopy foliage, and rugged terrain, make traditional mapping solutions impossible.</p>
<p class="bodytext">In addition to the tradeshows, GeoSAR also participated in a “ground breaking” ceremony in Anchorage AK to mark the beginning of the 5-year Alaska Statewide Digital Mapping Initiative (SDMI). GeoSAR is currently wrapping up acquisition in Alaska for the first phase of the project awarded earlier this year to Dewberry through the US Geological Survey. The event was attended by over 200 representatives of the federal, state, local and tribal governments, as well as numerous members of the press. Fugro staff also took the opportunity to educate people about IFSAR and the benefits that the resulting maps offer to the state.</p>
<p class="bodytext">After wrapping up a very successful month our conference trail continues with planned stops in Africa, Europe and South America. Please feel free to request further information or continue the conversation at info@geosar.com or leave a comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/08/04/from-the-usa-to-malaysia-geosar%e2%80%99s-global-presence-continues-to-grow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeoSAR Graces the Cover of PE&amp;RS</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/13/geosar-graces-the-cover-of-pers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/13/geosar-graces-the-cover-of-pers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChromaDepth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fugro EarthData]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PE&RS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GeoSAR will be gracing the cover of PE&#038;RS this month which will be distributed at the ESRI International User Conference July 12th- 16th in San Diego, CA. Be sure to pick up your copy, view [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">GeoSAR will be gracing the cover of PE&#038;RS this month which will be distributed at the ESRI International User Conference July 12th- 16th in San Diego, CA. Be sure to pick up your copy, view the cover, and read the feature article “Topographic Mapping Using IFSAR Data in a 3D Desktop GIS Environment” written by: L.G. (Jake) Jenkins and Larry Lund. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/13/geosar-graces-the-cover-of-pers/blog-3/" rel="attachment wp-att-282"><img src="http://www.geosar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/blog.jpg" alt="blog" title="blog" width="140" height="180" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-282" /></a></p>
<p class="bodytext">The cover image represents a Digital Elevation Model generated from GeoSAR’s P-band radar overlaid with X and P-band orthorectified images, all in the ChromaDepth® color scheme. The orthorectified images were filtered to increase homogeneity, reduce speckling and remove artifacts. Waterways were flattened and rendered monotonic. The final images were composed into the scene using ESRI®’s ArcGIS software using a custom color pallet that allows the cooler colors to recede and warmer colors to advance on the eye when viewed using the ChromaDepth® 3-D glasses.</p>
<p class="bodytext">GeoSAR’s X and P-band orthorectified images are arranged split screen to highlight features such as terrain, agricultural fields and mangroves. P-band is located in the upper left as the X-band is located in the lower right. P-band highlights features associated with human settlements such as agricultural fields, irrigation channels, roadways and buildings, even those that may be hidden below the vegetation, whereas the mangroves appear brighter in the X-band imagery because they scatter more of the radar energy back.</p>
<p class="bodytext">GeoSAR is the world’s only dual-band, single-pass airborne interferometric SAR system. Penetrating clouds and foliage, GeoSAR simultaneously maps surface features (using x-band) and near bare-earth elevation (using P-band), making it particularly well suited for equatorial mapping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/13/geosar-graces-the-cover-of-pers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ground Control</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/21/ground-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/21/ground-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ground Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corner reflectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiDAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After receiving a significant amount of response for our metadata blog, we decided to discuss one of the most important aspects of any mapping project, ground control. Ground control refers to pre-marked or photo identifiable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">After receiving a significant amount of response for our metadata blog, we decided to discuss one of the most important aspects of any mapping project, ground control. Ground control refers to pre-marked or photo identifiable points on the Earth’s surface with known positions that is used either to process and rectify the raw geospatial data or to verify the accuracy of the final mapping products.  Ground control networks are usually field surveyed in order to determine accurately their positions.  However, other sources of accurate ground points can be used to verify and validate the accuracy of geospatial data products.   Airborne LiDAR is excellent example of such sources as it provides highly accurate ground points that can be used in some instances as ground controls. </p>
<p class="bodytext">In GeoSAR mapping we typically use two types of ground control; a LiDAR profiler on the aircraft, and corner reflectors on the ground.  As we fly over an area, our LiDAR profiler collects millions of 3-dimentional points (X,Y,Z) with high fidelity. These points provide a highly accurate dataset to compare and validate the GeoSAR products. Corner Reflectors, on the other hand, are deployed in the project area prior to our data collection. Corner Reflectors are targets constructed of material that is highly reflective to the radar signal. These reflectors are surveyed with a high level of accuracy and then imaged by the radar as we fly over them. They provide an easily identifiable known location in the radar data. Reflector data are used in the least-squares adjustment, removing slight offsets in the data between bands, and as another source of validation. The image below shows a radar reflector used during one of our mapping projects. You will notice that there are four sides to the reflector, allowing the reflector to be imaged from multiple sides during a single collection. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/21/ground-control/copy-of-small_reflector/" rel="attachment wp-att-263"><img src="http://www.geosar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Copy-of-small_reflector.jpg" alt="Copy of small_reflector" title="Copy of small_reflector" width="420" height="353" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-263" /></a></p>
<p class="bodytext">Ground control points are just one attribute of our unique GeoSAR mapping solution. If you would like to continue the conversation or receive more information please leave a comment. Stay tuned for more GeoSAR capabilities and updates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/21/ground-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GEOSAR FOR BIOMASS MAPPING SOLUTION IN AMAZON FOREST</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/04/geosar-for-biomass-mapping-solution-in-amazon-forest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/04/geosar-for-biomass-mapping-solution-in-amazon-forest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Moon Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fugro EarthData]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ GeoSAR continues to make headlines! Fugro Earthdata recently announced that the Blue Moon Fund decided to utilize GeoSAR’s biomass mapping solution in the Amazon Rainforest. GeoSAR’s unique duel band frequencies (X-band and P-band) provide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext"> GeoSAR continues to make headlines! Fugro Earthdata recently announced that the <a href="http://www.bluemoonfund.org/">Blue Moon Fund </a>decided to utilize GeoSAR’s biomass mapping solution in the Amazon Rainforest. GeoSAR’s unique duel band frequencies (X-band and P-band) provide the perfect solution for estimating tropical rainforest biomass. The X-band reflects of the tree tops were the P-band penetrates through the foliage reflecting the near bare Earth, thus producing landscape-level estimates of carbon content in lowland tropical forests. Project deliverables include digital, high-resolution above-ground biomass estimates for the project area, and a map of total carbon storage for evaluation of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reducing_emissions_from_deforestation_and_forest_degradation">REDD </a>related baseline. The work will be funded through a grant extended by the Blue Moon Fund and executed through the fund’s partnerships with Wake Forest University (WFU) and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Please stay tuned for more GeoSAR updates! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/04/geosar-for-biomass-mapping-solution-in-amazon-forest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Deal with Metadata</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/21/what-is-the-deal-with-metadata/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/21/what-is-the-deal-with-metadata/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 15:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coordinate system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I recently confronted my colleagues at work and asked them why metadata is important, I received a mixture of groans and laughter. At least the topic left no one indifferent.
So what is metadata and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">When I recently confronted my colleagues at work and asked them why metadata is important, I received a mixture of groans and laughter. At least the topic left no one indifferent.</p>
<p class="bodytext">So what is metadata and why the strong reaction? Metadata is data that describes the definition, structure, and administration of other data files. It is, quite literally, data about data. Creating detailed metadata has a reputation as a difficult and painstaking process that requires numerous workers toiling long into the night. However, I’ve worked with a lot of data over the years and I thought I knew different. </p>
<p class="bodytext">To my mind, metadata is an essential part of analysis. Sure, it may be difficult to produce good metadata, but it is so valuable when done right. I decided to dig a little deeper and found a metadata champion to back me up – Fugro EarthData’s mapping specialist, Larry Lund. He’s an expert in data analysis and interpretation and he relies upon accurate metadata everyday. “First of all, you can’t import data into a GIS tool without knowing the projection and coordinate system information and that’s part of standard metadata.”  He said, adding, “You may also need to know when this data was captured or its resolution and accuracy &#8211; interpreters need that information. It just saves everybody a lot of time”.</p>
<p class="bodytext">I think he’s right. Metadata also documents the origin of data or the production techniques that produced it, essential information for any type of geospatial data analysis. That’s why detailed metadata is at the center of every GeoSAR delivery.</p>
<p class="bodytext">As for the idea that metadata seems hard to produce, it turns out that GeoSAR’s metadata production process is actually a highly-automated program that crawls the network and analyzes the individual files that make up a data delivery. The programming routine performs actions such as “count the number of pixels” or “determine post-spacing”. Once the routine has extracted the information, GeoSAR easily produces FGDC compliant metadata in a variety of formats and delivers it along with binary data.</p>
<p class="bodytext">Now if I could just get some help with spreadsheet macros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/21/what-is-the-deal-with-metadata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Talk About GeoSAR!</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/07/lets-talk-about-geosar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/07/lets-talk-about-geosar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fugro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geo-Informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEOINT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEOINT Tech Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geospatial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTERGEO- East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PE&RS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ We are very pleased with the GeoSAR blog reader’s responses to the GeoSAR 101 Crossword Puzzle. If you are just tuning in, please feel free to download the crossword and answers to update your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext"> We are very pleased with the GeoSAR blog reader’s responses to the GeoSAR 101 Crossword Puzzle. If you are just tuning in, please feel free to download the crossword and answers to update your knowledge of GeoSAR. As we move forward in the upcoming weeks we have many exciting developments happening in the world of GeoSAR. You will be able to read about these developments soon in upcoming articles to be published in the June/July issues of PE&#038;RS and Geo-Informatics magazine. In the meantime, we have rolled out a new ad in the April issue of GIM Magazine and we would appreciate your feedback on the ad’s messaging and its overall appearance. If you send us your comments we will send you a GeoSAR token of appreciation!</p>
<p class="bodytext"> Finally, if you’re planning to attend the INTERGEO- East conference in Instanbul, Turkey, or the GEONT Tech Days in Washington DC this month, be sure to drop by the Fugro booth to learn more about our unique geospatial solutions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/07/lets-talk-about-geosar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeoSAR 101 Crossword Puzzle Answers</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/28/geosar-101-crossword-puzzle-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/28/geosar-101-crossword-puzzle-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-band IFSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthorectification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puzzle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topographic mapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As requested, please click on the link below for the GeoSAR 101 Crossword Puzzle answers. Thank you to all who played! Please stay tuned for more GeoSAR updates next week!
GeoSAR Crossword Puzzle Answers
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext"> As requested, please click on the link below for the GeoSAR 101 Crossword Puzzle answers. Thank you to all who played! Please stay tuned for more GeoSAR updates next week!</p>
<p><a href='http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/28/geosar-101-crossword-puzzle-answers/crossword_answers-2/' rel='attachment wp-att-231'>GeoSAR Crossword Puzzle Answers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/28/geosar-101-crossword-puzzle-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeoSAR 101 Crossword</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/16/geosar-101-crossword/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/16/geosar-101-crossword/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-band IFSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foliage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p-band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topographic mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-band]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we decided to have fun with our GeoSAR blog readers! All the answers to the crossword below can be found within the GeoSAR website and/or previous GeoSAR blogs. Good Luck! Answers will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">This week we decided to have fun with our GeoSAR blog readers! All the answers to the crossword below can be found within the GeoSAR website and/or previous GeoSAR blogs. Good Luck! Answers will be posted next week. Please click on the link below to download the puzzle and clues! For any questions or hints please feel free to write to info@geosar.com.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.geosar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/GeoSAR-Crossword-Puzzle.pdf'>GeoSAR Crossword Puzzle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/16/geosar-101-crossword/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Snow to Sand: The Benefits of Dual-Band IFSAR</title>
		<link>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/01/from-snow-to-sand-the-benefits-of-dual-band-ifsar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/01/from-snow-to-sand-the-benefits-of-dual-band-ifsar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fugro EarthData]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geosar.com/blog/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The conference trail grows longer! At last post, we had just returned from the Alaska Surveying and Mapping Conference in Anchorage where GeoSAR Project Manager Steven Shaffer presented the applications of dual-band IFSAR in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext"> The conference trail grows longer! At <a href="http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/03/02/on-the-tradeshow-trail-dc-to-anchorage-to-dc/">last post</a>, we had just returned from the Alaska Surveying and Mapping Conference in Anchorage where GeoSAR Project Manager Steven Shaffer presented the applications of dual-band IFSAR in arctic and sub-arctic environments. Snow penetration/mapping was part of that discussion. This week we are switching gears—rather dramatically—to the Map Middle East Conference in Dubai where last week GeoSAR Client Program Manager Caroline Tyra presented a paper on the ability of radar to penetrate sand for subsurface mapping.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> The overall concept isn’t exactly new. Ground penetrating radar (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground-penetrating_radar">GPR</a>) technology, which utilizes radar bands in the UHF/VHF frequencies from hand-held or vehicular-based equipment, is a well established technique. It’s the use of remote sensing platforms for subsurface mapping that is gaining ground (no pun intended!). Using satellite and airborne methods, it is possible to provide wide-area coverage of subsurface hydrology and structures for use in mineral exploration and development, infrastructure design, and archeological research.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> So where is the science? In the early 1980s, the hyper-arid Bir Safsaf region in southwestern Egypt was mapped using Shutte Radar SIR-A and SIR-B to detect geologic structures covered by layers of sand. Discoveries from that research included fossil river systems. More recent studies have shown the ability of very low-frequency radar, such as P-band, to penetrate depths of 15 meters or more depending on soil composition, radar incidence angles, and soil moisture.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> Fugro EarthData has confirmed these P-band findings using GeoSAR during a mission over the Mojave Desert near Edwards Air Force Base. Among other things, the results revealed a mostly submerged geological formation. Subsurface mapping is an area we’ll continue to research given its many implications related to water networks, national security, and heritage management. It’s also one more way that we can help clients maximize the value of their GeoSAR data—by unlocking what we call, “the Power of P”.</p>
<p class="bodytext"> Want to continue the conversation? Leave a comment or send us an email at info@geosar.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geosar.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/01/from-snow-to-sand-the-benefits-of-dual-band-ifsar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
