home    corporate Fugro website    contact us  
 
  solutions    deliverables    IFSAR technology    events    downloads    
 

Posts Tagged ‘GeoSAR’

Remote Sensing and Climate Change Part 1: Forest Carbon Monitoring in Support of REDD

Friday, December 4th, 2009

timber-truck

This week, we are kicking off a blog series on remote sensing and climate change, a timely topic given the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP-15) later this month. The first topic of discussion: carbon accounting.

In addition to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, many experts agree that managing the world’s terrestrial carbon is critical to addressing the problem of climate change. Doing so will require first measuring and then monitoring carbon levels found within the world’s trees, soils, and peat. Carbon accounting of tropical forests is deemed especially important since they comprise the world’s largest natural filter of CO2 emissions.

Of course, for developing nations, where the majority of tropical forests reside, these forests provide a major source of economic development. Keeping these forests intact is the goal of the United Nation’s Collaborative Program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD).

At the most basic level, REDD seeks to generate a new financing stream for sustainable forest management in developing countries, providing monetary incentives for conservation over development. A plan initiated by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown last weekend may give a jumpstart to this concept.

Looking ahead to COP-15, Brown proposed a ÂŁ10 billion fund, backed by wealthy nations, to assist developing nations in battling climate change. The funding proposed by Brown would go toward developing low-carbon energy sources, managing the effects of a warming climate, and halting deforestation. As part of this plan, Brown called for an international satellite monitoring system to measure compliance with the program.

And while Brown’s plan provides a step in the right direction when it comes to REDD, it may well oversimplify the solution. Is satellite technology the sole answer? Definitely not. There are a wide range of optical, LiDAR, and IFSAR sensors—airborne, as well as satellite—that offer a variety resolutions and data products to support tropical forest monitoring efforts. Each sensor-type has both benefits and drawbacks, but combined with in situ technologies, can be used to create very accurate maps to meet the goal of improved carbon management.

Next week, we’ll dig into the specifics of those technologies, so be sure to check back then. In the meantime, feel free to continue the conversation. Do you see forest carbon monitoring as an essential role to halting climate change? Have you been involved in any such research? What were the results?

Remote Sensing and Climate Change: Introducing a Three-Part Series

Friday, November 20th, 2009

COP-15

Next month, leaders from 193 countries will meet in Copenhagen to participate in the United Nations Climate Change Conference of Parties (COP-15). There’s a lot of attention on this year’s meeting as participants work to craft an ambitious global climate agreement that will begin in 2012 when the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol expires. Whether there is enough support to bring about a binding agreement at COP-15 is doubtful, however. Recent statements from the United States and elsewhere indicate there are still too many questions yet to be resolved. Even so, many see the conference as an ideal place to tackle the issues of “burden sharing” and related concerns so that an agreement can be signed in 2010, if not 2009.

So what has this got to do with a geospatial blog? Quite a lot, actually. A quick visit to the “Methods & Science” section of the UN Conference on Climate Change website shows several areas where remote sensing technologies will play an important role in the developing carbon market. Most notable is REDD, short for “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries”. We’ve written about REDD before on this blog, and we’ll be paying more attention to it in the coming weeks as we begin a three-part series on climate change leading up to COP-15.

Topics in our series will include geospatial capabilities for carbon monitoring, with an emphasis on radar; legislation that will impact climate change policy both in the United States and abroad; and the push for REDD approval.

We hope you’ll log on and contribute to the discussion, which will be facilitated by GeoSAR Client Program Manager, Caroline Tyra, our resident expert in all things carbon. If there is a climate change topic not mentioned here, that you’d like us to address, let us know and we’ll be sure to tackle it.

Nobel Prizes: A Win for Geospatial

Friday, October 16th, 2009

This year’s Nobel Prizes are getting a lot of attention. Who hasn’t yet heard the controversy surrounding President Obama’s award of the Peace Prize? You would have to be on a desert island to miss the continuing coverage.

On the science front, the awards are much more straightforward. The Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to three men whose work in the 1960s made a huge impact on the geospatial industry today. Dr. Charles Kao won for his pioneering role in fiber optic telecommunications. Without his efforts there would have been no internet boom, no online mapping craze, no words being written and read on this blog.

The other two winners, Mr. Willard Boyle and Mr. George Smith, were honored for their creation of the charged-couple device (CCD) in 1969. This technology became the basis for today’s digital cameras, as well as those very high-tech imaging sensors used on satellites and aircraft to map and monitor the Earth’s surface.

Three cheers for these fine contributions and for the committee’s recognition of their importance. The awards are questionable neither in worthiness nor in timing.

Perhaps radar achievements will be recognized next!

Welcome to "The Location Age"

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Geospatial isn't just for map geeks anymore. We've got personal navigation devices that dictate driving directions, smart phone apps that are as useful as they are fun, and GPS-equipped dog collars so Fido never gets lost again. Whether conscious of the change or not, consumers in the industrialized countries are now fully entrenched in "The Location Age".

But it's not the same story all over the world. In fact, many developing countries are struggling to update their most basic map inventories. How can this be? Providing answers to this question was a main goal of the recent National Mapping Organizations Industry Forum organized by GIS Development in South Africa. Serving as a prelude to the much larger Map Africa 2009 conference, forum participants were asked to share the vision and objectives of their organization, the challenges they face in realizing this vision, and their thoughts on the role of geospatial technology and the industry in achieving these goals.

Participants cited numerous obstacles to implementing effective programs. Voiced almost unanimously, however, was the misperception among policy makers that geospatial data is a luxury rather than a necessity. This notion is further complicated by a bewildering disconnect about the value of survey and mapping data to infrastructure development. This, despite the billions of investment dollars currently flowing into the region for infrastructure improvements…

These statements are dismal for sure, but many also noted a growing awareness of geographic information slowly penetrating up to higher levels in government. It also appears that some of the new data, software, and training resources available internationally are starting to reach local users. Public outreach will help strengthen this trend, as will sustained partnerships by private companies willing to help with the education effort through technology exchange. Decades-old perceptions don't change overnight, but Fugro, for one, is dedicated to the mission.

It's true: geospatial isn't just for map geeks anymore.

Beyond Points and Pixels

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

As summer winds down and fall ramps up (at least in the Northern Hemisphere), so too does the GeoSAR event calendar. Participating in conferences and workshops across the globe, our client program managers (CPMs) have been globetrotting more than normal lately. But any stress felt by long lines and limited leg space is well tempered by a love for travel. As Roy Hill, a veteran CPM explains it, “It’s only after you’ve actually been to a place—seen its topography and experienced its culture—that you can begin to envision all the potential ways geospatial data can be employed.” Indeed, mapping isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution anymore.

This notion played out last month at the Map Asia conference held in Singapore. There, Roy presented a paper entitled, “Advanced Feature Extraction and Classification Using GeoSAR P-band and X-band DBInSAR”. It’s a new technique with a long list of potential applications, including, resource mapping, intelligence mapping, and biomass estimation. For a government considering new country-level topographic mapping, this capability far out-values the off-the-shelf, points-and-pixels approach to geo-knowledge development.

In fact, it was the biomass potential that made a big impact in the room that day. A gentleman, whose company consults on REDD-based programs, was intrigued to learn of a remote sensing approach to carbon accounting that could overcome the barriers of weather and dense foliage. But it’s not just the single solution that is exciting; it’s the ability to exploit a foundational dataset to develop new revenue streams and answer critical emerging issues. The science has come so far…why not make the most of it?

Disaster Strikes

Friday, September 4th, 2009

While preparing a blog entry on our recent travel to Bali for the South East Asian Survey Congress, we were saddened to learn of the 7.0 earthquake that rocked the nearby island of Java. Compounding the damage caused by the quake itself are results of the massive landslide it triggered. News reports state that more than 8,000 homes, schools, businesses, and mosques have been damaged in the landslide. Dozens of people have been killed with the toll rising as recovery efforts carry on.

So many of the themes discussed in Bali pertain to just these situations—the role of geospatial data for disaster management; concerns over remote sensing access, usage, and dissemination; the need to extract knowledge from geospatial data. But these discussions are best left for another day. Today, we offer our deepest sympathy to those who have lost so much. Our thoughts are with you.

Monitoring the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

Iceberg

There’s a real-life drama playing out in the Arctic again this summer, and no, we aren’t talking about Deadliest Catch reruns on the Discovery Channel. Rather, we are referring to the drastic loss of summer sea ice in the Arctic Ocean. Recent findings from the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center show this year’s melting to be on par with the record setting levels of 2007. And while the full impact of these events is not yet known, the report further justifies the Arctic’s reputation as “ground zero” for climate change.

As users and providers of geospatial data, it will come as no surprise to you that remote sensing is playing a key role in these Arctic ice observations. Radar sensors are particularly well suited for such studies given the region’s temporal lack of daylight and persistent cloud cover. Acquiring data 24 hours a day and in a variety of weather conditions, radar-based imagery reveals roughness patterns in the ice that allows analysts to gauge both thickness and age.

The use of radar data for this purpose dates as far back as 1978 when NASA used its SEASAT system to monitor polar sea ice conditions. Fast forward three decades, and NASA’s innovation continues with an airborne mission this spring over Iceland and Greenland. This latest effort combined two radar bands in hopes of accurately measuring the speed, direction, and topographic height of ice caps whose sub-glacial topography has already been mapped. If successful, these data will provide researchers with better data from which to model glacial mechanics.

Fugro EarthData is also actively engaged in ice mapping research. With a science-based project scheduled for completion later this year, we aim to provide a sound basis for the use of the GeoSAR dual-band radar mapping for ice studies. If you know of other radar-based ice studies, let’s talk about them here…send us your thoughts and experiences.

In Support of the Geospatial Revolution Project

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Last year, a good friend and former colleague, Karen Schuckman, told us about a new initiative to document the evolution of geospatial technologies in a documentary for public television. It sounded like a lofty goal at the time, but then it is unwise to underestimate Ms. Schuckman. In addition to her own long resume of accomplishments, she tends to surround herself with only the most capable of people. And so it comes as no surprise that the trailer for Geospatial Revolution Project, has been exceedingly well received among insiders and non-geospatial professionals, alike.

GeoSAR_blog_geospatialrev

The trailer was first introduced in May at this year’s annual ASPRS conference. Since then, it has been getting play among a more varied audience—including Facebook members, YouTube watchers, and most recently, the U.S. Congressional Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight. As reported by Got Geoint? and All Points Blog, the video was shown prior to last week’s policy hearing on federal geospatial management. If after watching the trailer, subcommittee members understood for the first time the true value of geospatial data, then we as a community owe a large debt of gratitude to the documentary’s contributors, funders, and production team.

Click here to check out the trailer and join us in spreading the word about this ground-breaking media project. For Fugro EarthData’s part, we look forward to contributing to the effort, which has the potential to make a huge impact on our field. As users continually embrace geospatial technology—including foundational datasets like IFSAR—now is the time to demonstrate where all this information comes from. After all, it’s not just the magic of Google Earth…it’s also what lies beneath.

Bada Bing: The Challenge of Innovation

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

Earlier this summer, Microsoft launched its revamped “Live Search” service under the name “Bing.” If you haven’t seen it—and chances are you haven’t—you should. It’s pretty cool. The fact that you may not have tried it yet (we only recently did) proves how hard it can be to introduce a new product or service offering, despite its cool factor. Generating excitement for innovation among the din of complacency is an uphill battle, but once won, the rewards are as satisfying for the provider as they are for the early adopters and mass audience who follow.

Consider the rise of Google in the 1990s and our own recent “revolution” in the remote sensing world. At about the same time Google was overturning the well established likes of Yahoo and MSN, Optech and Leica were proving the same was possible in the remote sensing industry. By replacing photogrammetrically generated DEMs with dense, accurate LiDAR-sourced DEMs, these companies and early adopters helped usher in a new wave of productivity and an expanded user base for geospatial data.

Are we now facing a similar movement with IFSAR? While IFSAR will not replace LiDAR mapping altogether, it is gaining acceptance as a cost-effective alternative for large area, small scale topographic mapping projects. Further, dual-band IFSAR is showing value for even broader applications, including oil and gas exploration and carbon accounting. And that brings us to another question: what are the keys for successfully promoting new technology in the geospatial marketplace? Is it science first or marketing first? We believe it starts with science, but what about you?

The Importance of Technology Transfer

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

GeoSAR_Blog_2

The temperature outside San Diego’s convention center last week perfectly matched the mood of ESRI User Conference attendees inside: comfortable. With turnout reportedly down 30 percent due to the global economic recession, the event was short on fireworks but long on focus. Instead of major announcements and elaborate product launches, speakers and exhibitors honed in on solution-based themes, such as personalizing the user experience and creating actionable data. Ideas worth celebrating, these trends require varying levels of technology transfer, a concept that is near and dear to our GeoSAR hearts.

Why do we promote technology transfer? It’s not just a catch-phrase, it’s a service we provide to help customers maximize their data. IFSAR mapping and analysis is still very cutting edge and as such is met with some resistance. The data looks and acts differently than traditional image-based and LiDAR mapping. When processed to resemble a traditional map product, however, clients are well pleased—astounded even—with the result. Training customers to analyze the data and create finished GeoSAR products themselves adds value to the overall geospatial investment. Rather than relying on a third-party contractor for these services, the technology transfer empowers customers to utilize GeoSAR data in ways that would otherwise be prohibitive. In this way, data that originally was intended to support topographic mapping could be used later to support a wide range of other applications, such as national defense, hydrology studies, or carbon mapping.

And here’s something else to celebrate…while we noted there were no elaborate product launches unveiled at ESRI, Fugro EarthData’s rather quiet debut of a new panoramic mapping capability is likely to generate a lot of buzz down the line. With simultaneous capture of high resolution vertical and oblique imagery, this system promises GeoSAR users an efficient alternative to satellite collections for multi-sourced spatial data frameworks. Stay tuned for more information.