home    corporate Fugro website    contact us  
 
  solutions    deliverables    IFSAR technology    events    downloads    blog    
 

Posts Tagged ‘geospatial’

Precision and Accuracy

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

As a key player in the map-making business, Fugro is always engaged in discussions about precision, accuracy, and reliability standards within the geospatial marketplace. Fugro’s GeoSAR system has unique features that ensure quality standards are always met. These features include 4-look acquisition data redundancy as a primary feature of the GeoSAR dual-sided radar configuration, its large side overlap on adjacent flight lines, and its profiling LiDAR. As discussed in our previous “Ground Control” blog post on ground control on the fly.

Let’s first discuss what these quality terms mean in relation to GeoSAR. Accuracy is an absolute term, describing how close the estimated elevation (or position) at a given point is to the true elevation (or position) of that point. Precision is a relative term, describing the quality of the height difference between two points. Reliability is the ability to detect and correct measurement errors, which depends highly on the redundancy of the measurements.

For example, imagine using an old tape measure with 1/8” markings to measure the height of a table at all four corners. Suppose that the measurements are 30-2/8”, 30-1/8”, 29-7/8”, and 30-1/8” – or equivalent to an average of 30-1/8” with a precision of 1/8”. Suddenly, you discover you are off by an inch. That is accuracy. The measurements were inaccurate by about 1”. This example shows that measurements can be very precise, but not necessarily accurate, or they can be accurate, but not precise.

To prevent such errors, the GeoSAR system uses a calibration campaign to resolve systematic errors using precisely surveyed corner reflectors at known locations on a calibration site. A corner reflector is to radar what a benchmark is to photogrammetry—it provides a very precise geospatial correspondence between a radar point and a {X, Y, Z} location on the ground. This is done to ensure the GeoSAR measurements are accurate.

The precision of GeoSAR, or airborne IFSAR, depends on factors such as the aircraft altitude, amount of turbulence, the separation between flight lines, terrain slope, moisture, and other factors. In typical situations, airborne IFSAR is able to measure terrain elevation and geoposition at meter level precision. The accuracy of GeoSAR products depend on a variety of key factors, including the GPS position of the aircraft, the quality of ground control, and the accuracy of the geoid. Similar to GPS, Fugro GeoSAR elevations are measured in ellipsoidal heights and converted to orthometric heights using a geoid model. The more accurate the geoid model, the more accurate the GeoSAR orthometric height will be.

Understanding and applying these key factors is what separates Fugro’s GeoSAR services and products from other service providers. Stay tuned next week when we discuss Resolution and Posting. If you would like to continue this discussion or would like more information, please leave a comment!

Let’s Talk About GeoSAR!

Friday, May 7th, 2010

We are very pleased with the GeoSAR blog reader’s responses to the GeoSAR 101 Crossword Puzzle. If you are just tuning in, please feel free to download the crossword and answers to update your knowledge of GeoSAR. As we move forward in the upcoming weeks we have many exciting developments happening in the world of GeoSAR. You will be able to read about these developments soon in upcoming articles to be published in the June/July issues of PE&RS and Geo-Informatics magazine. In the meantime, we have rolled out a new ad in the April issue of GIM Magazine and we would appreciate your feedback on the ad’s messaging and its overall appearance. If you send us your comments we will send you a GeoSAR token of appreciation!

Finally, if you’re planning to attend the INTERGEO- East conference in Instanbul, Turkey, or the GEONT Tech Days in Washington DC this month, be sure to drop by the Fugro booth to learn more about our unique geospatial solutions.

Remote Sensing and Climate Change Part II: Making REDD Work

Friday, December 18th, 2009

As heads of state and other government leaders enter the final rounds of the COP-15 climate change talks, many key issues remain unresolved. The target rate of emissions reductions by wealthy nations, the amount of aid to poor nations, and monitoring compliance are at the crux of the slow-moving negotiations.

It’s the monitoring piece where geospatial comes into play. As addressed in our last entry about the REDD initiative, several remote sensing methodologies can contribute to large-area forest carbon measurement and monitoring, each with unique benefits. This week we are taking a closer look, reviewing the top-three technologies and briefly exploring their strengths and weaknesses:

Optical imaging: Offering low-cost, repeat coverage acquisition over large project areas, satellite-based hyperspectral and multispectral imagery has shown some potential for biomass estimation. Systems with sophisticated scheduling enable around 70 percent cloud-free coverage in equatorial regions, thereby reducing weather obstacles. And while satellite is proving a good source for monitoring REDD sites in Brazil, it alone isn’t a good source for carbon measurement. For that, you need tree height data and optical imagery provides only canopy-level information.

LiDAR mapping: Foresters have long used LiDAR systems to measure forest canopy and vertical structures. As an active sensor, airborne LiDAR data can be acquired night or day, providing very dense and accurate datasets. The downside to this approach is the high cost of acquisition and processing over large areas. Satellite-based LiDAR systems may help control these costs with wide area coverage and automated processing capabilities. The Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) on NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) is one such example. Some studies show promising results, though clouds are an issue, and so is a general lack of ground height data. So, again, LiDAR may be a technology best suited for monitoring practices.

IFSAR mapping: Low frequency, long bandwidth IFSAR is an all-weather technology that provides high foliage penetration for near bare-earth elevation data, even in dense forests. When combined with higher frequency, short bandwidth IFSAR (which provides elevations of top surfaces), it is possible to detect the heights of individual trees within a forest. That’s the beauty of GeoSAR; it offers both views of the forest simultaneously and can also be used to identify forest type. This data, combined with biomass information on individual tree species, enables efficient and accurate forest carbon content estimations.

But GeoSAR isn’t a silver bullet. Given the relative high cost of airborne acquisitions in comparison to satellite sensors, IFSAR isn’t an ideal monitoring solution. It’s role is to provide accurate baseline information from which REDD programs can be evaluated.

Fugro EarthData published an article about using dual-band IFSAR for carbon accounting in the July issue of PE&RS. It’s a good source of information about remote sensing and climate change monitoring. And, if you want to catch the latest on COP-15, here’s a live web cast of the proceedings.

Next week: COP-15 wrap-up and its implications for remote sensing. Check back then!

Remote Sensing and Climate Change: Introducing a Three-Part Series

Friday, November 20th, 2009

COP-15

Next month, leaders from 193 countries will meet in Copenhagen to participate in the United Nations Climate Change Conference of Parties (COP-15). There’s a lot of attention on this year’s meeting as participants work to craft an ambitious global climate agreement that will begin in 2012 when the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol expires. Whether there is enough support to bring about a binding agreement at COP-15 is doubtful, however. Recent statements from the United States and elsewhere indicate there are still too many questions yet to be resolved. Even so, many see the conference as an ideal place to tackle the issues of “burden sharing” and related concerns so that an agreement can be signed in 2010, if not 2009.

So what has this got to do with a geospatial blog? Quite a lot, actually. A quick visit to the “Methods & Science” section of the UN Conference on Climate Change website shows several areas where remote sensing technologies will play an important role in the developing carbon market. Most notable is REDD, short for “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries”. We’ve written about REDD before on this blog, and we’ll be paying more attention to it in the coming weeks as we begin a three-part series on climate change leading up to COP-15.

Topics in our series will include geospatial capabilities for carbon monitoring, with an emphasis on radar; legislation that will impact climate change policy both in the United States and abroad; and the push for REDD approval.

We hope you’ll log on and contribute to the discussion, which will be facilitated by GeoSAR Client Program Manager, Caroline Tyra, our resident expert in all things carbon. If there is a climate change topic not mentioned here, that you’d like us to address, let us know and we’ll be sure to tackle it.

Nobel Prizes: A Win for Geospatial

Friday, October 16th, 2009

This year’s Nobel Prizes are getting a lot of attention. Who hasn’t yet heard the controversy surrounding President Obama’s award of the Peace Prize? You would have to be on a desert island to miss the continuing coverage.

On the science front, the awards are much more straightforward. The Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to three men whose work in the 1960s made a huge impact on the geospatial industry today. Dr. Charles Kao won for his pioneering role in fiber optic telecommunications. Without his efforts there would have been no internet boom, no online mapping craze, no words being written and read on this blog.

The other two winners, Mr. Willard Boyle and Mr. George Smith, were honored for their creation of the charged-couple device (CCD) in 1969. This technology became the basis for today’s digital cameras, as well as those very high-tech imaging sensors used on satellites and aircraft to map and monitor the Earth’s surface.

Three cheers for these fine contributions and for the committee’s recognition of their importance. The awards are questionable neither in worthiness nor in timing.

Perhaps radar achievements will be recognized next!

Monitoring the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

Iceberg

There’s a real-life drama playing out in the Arctic again this summer, and no, we aren’t talking about Deadliest Catch reruns on the Discovery Channel. Rather, we are referring to the drastic loss of summer sea ice in the Arctic Ocean. Recent findings from the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center show this year’s melting to be on par with the record setting levels of 2007. And while the full impact of these events is not yet known, the report further justifies the Arctic’s reputation as “ground zero” for climate change.

As users and providers of geospatial data, it will come as no surprise to you that remote sensing is playing a key role in these Arctic ice observations. Radar sensors are particularly well suited for such studies given the region’s temporal lack of daylight and persistent cloud cover. Acquiring data 24 hours a day and in a variety of weather conditions, radar-based imagery reveals roughness patterns in the ice that allows analysts to gauge both thickness and age.

The use of radar data for this purpose dates as far back as 1978 when NASA used its SEASAT system to monitor polar sea ice conditions. Fast forward three decades, and NASA’s innovation continues with an airborne mission this spring over Iceland and Greenland. This latest effort combined two radar bands in hopes of accurately measuring the speed, direction, and topographic height of ice caps whose sub-glacial topography has already been mapped. If successful, these data will provide researchers with better data from which to model glacial mechanics.

Fugro EarthData is also actively engaged in ice mapping research. With a science-based project scheduled for completion later this year, we aim to provide a sound basis for the use of the GeoSAR dual-band radar mapping for ice studies. If you know of other radar-based ice studies, let’s talk about them here…send us your thoughts and experiences.

In Support of the Geospatial Revolution Project

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Last year, a good friend and former colleague, Karen Schuckman, told us about a new initiative to document the evolution of geospatial technologies in a documentary for public television. It sounded like a lofty goal at the time, but then it is unwise to underestimate Ms. Schuckman. In addition to her own long resume of accomplishments, she tends to surround herself with only the most capable of people. And so it comes as no surprise that the trailer for Geospatial Revolution Project, has been exceedingly well received among insiders and non-geospatial professionals, alike.

GeoSAR_blog_geospatialrev

The trailer was first introduced in May at this year’s annual ASPRS conference. Since then, it has been getting play among a more varied audience—including Facebook members, YouTube watchers, and most recently, the U.S. Congressional Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight. As reported by Got Geoint? and All Points Blog, the video was shown prior to last week’s policy hearing on federal geospatial management. If after watching the trailer, subcommittee members understood for the first time the true value of geospatial data, then we as a community owe a large debt of gratitude to the documentary’s contributors, funders, and production team.

Click here to check out the trailer and join us in spreading the word about this ground-breaking media project. For Fugro EarthData’s part, we look forward to contributing to the effort, which has the potential to make a huge impact on our field. As users continually embrace geospatial technology—including foundational datasets like IFSAR—now is the time to demonstrate where all this information comes from. After all, it’s not just the magic of Google Earth…it’s also what lies beneath.

Bada Bing: The Challenge of Innovation

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

Earlier this summer, Microsoft launched its revamped “Live Search” service under the name “Bing.” If you haven’t seen it—and chances are you haven’t—you should. It’s pretty cool. The fact that you may not have tried it yet (we only recently did) proves how hard it can be to introduce a new product or service offering, despite its cool factor. Generating excitement for innovation among the din of complacency is an uphill battle, but once won, the rewards are as satisfying for the provider as they are for the early adopters and mass audience who follow.

Consider the rise of Google in the 1990s and our own recent “revolution” in the remote sensing world. At about the same time Google was overturning the well established likes of Yahoo and MSN, Optech and Leica were proving the same was possible in the remote sensing industry. By replacing photogrammetrically generated DEMs with dense, accurate LiDAR-sourced DEMs, these companies and early adopters helped usher in a new wave of productivity and an expanded user base for geospatial data.

Are we now facing a similar movement with IFSAR? While IFSAR will not replace LiDAR mapping altogether, it is gaining acceptance as a cost-effective alternative for large area, small scale topographic mapping projects. Further, dual-band IFSAR is showing value for even broader applications, including oil and gas exploration and carbon accounting. And that brings us to another question: what are the keys for successfully promoting new technology in the geospatial marketplace? Is it science first or marketing first? We believe it starts with science, but what about you?